Timesizing®
not downsizing|
DEFINITION:
|
We also answer: How do we get wartime prosperity without war? Wartime prosperity depended on a labor shortage that harnessed market forces to raise wages, spread the national income to the bottom 80% who wanted & needed to spend it, and boosted spending=demand & marketable productivity=sustainable investments. But how do we get a labor shortage without killing people? We had actually found a way before the war interrupted and upstaged it = workweek reduction (1938-39-40: hrs/wk 44-42-40, unemployment 19-17.2-14.6%)? - Walter Reuther called it 'fluctuating adjustment of the workweek against unemployment.' Pursuing this strategy solves two puzzles: (1) When introducing technology, how can CEOs, without makework, maintain or increase employment and markets instead of downsizing jobs & the consumer markets & investments they support and dragging government (& taxpayers) into the role of employer and charity of last resort? (Bonus question: Is there some way to check inflation under full employment - without checking growth by raising interest?) (2) How do we then shift from maximizing consumption to save our economy, to minimizing consumption to save our ecosystem? (Taboo question: How do we stop the unlimited consolidation of our national income & wealth among the top .01% of our population from proceeding beyond the point where it starts cannibalizing its own consumer base?) Two answers, two 'gears': (1) Timesizing = switch from trimming the workforce and the consumer base to trimming the workweek as long as unemployment is too high or wages too low; make honest self-support easier, not taxpayer-support and charity and crime, and – crucial – automatically convert overtime into training and jobs. (2) Once everyone is included in the worksharing system, GDP growth becomes optional instead of systemically necessary, because for the first time, growth can be limited without starving the now well-employed 'poor' or clobbering the consumer base (and the economy that's based on it). So then we can cut the workweek further to downshift production & consumption and save the planet without killing the economy. (And then, based on this work-balancing program, we design programs to balance money.) Use this website for worst-case planning, economic design, and news on the current economic "recovery" as spun by both Right and Left, critiqued from the 3rd way viewpoint of a student of ecology, linguistics and history. |
hope du jourtm –
7/01/2009 wednesday
(archives) –
TIMESIZING instead of downsizing in the news
(archives)
- Google Search newsclips of what the world's doing that's on the right track
- the core solution is so obvious, nobody's noticing it - it's our closest candidate to a single all-sufficient control and it's reinvented thousands of times a day in every downturn despite *dismissal by the 'experts' -
|
|
How? By adjusting the workweek down & up - instead of firing & hiring - based on a comprehensive blueprint for a green economy
& a new worktime economics where, 100 years from now, people will be...
|
![]() |
||
| (in deteriorating stages) | (in stepped enhancements) | |
|
|
For details, see our social-software manual, in simple language -

This numbered, first edition is available from *Amazon.com.
More angles on Timesizing
(Join shorter worktime e-list by emailingswt-digest-request@swt.org with 'subscribe' as msg)
Bibliography |
Audiences | Research Priorities |
Phil's Bio
Politics |The Forgotten Republican Key to Small Government | Sayings
Investment Advice |
Why should I be forced to stop work at a certain #hrs/wk?!
America's Massive Pervasive Makework | Letting off steam | Opus Errata
Timesizing Courses |
Website History |
Website Reactions | Guest Book