The Timesizing® Wire
©2000 Phil Hyde, The Timesizing Wire™, Box 622, Cambridge MA 02140 USA (617) 623-8080


Corporate Fines/Settlements
"...Things fall apart. The center cannot hold. Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.... And everywhere, the ceremony of innocence is drowned. The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity...."  Yeats, The Second Coming (1921)


[just gotta get in one more BIG one -]
12/20/2000  Exxon [Mobil] ordered to pay $3.5B, pointer digest (to A14), NYT, C1.
...in damages..\..by an Alabama jury...after it found..\..the nation's largest oil company...guilty of defrauding the state of royalty payments from natural gas wells in state waters. The verdict is one of the largest ever against a company in a case based solely on accusations of financial harm.
[Solely accusations? No evidence? Are we sinking back to the Salem witch trials and their "spectral evidence"?]

12/01/2000  policy change - We are going to drop this as a specific everyday-watch category and bust it back to only-when-dramatic, and then we'll group it in with our Miscellaneous Evils on our Omens or Collapse page. Why? Because we just thought of a much better category that probably won't be as frequent but that is much MUCH more important, and we need to 'train our eyes' to see it better - makework. This all came about in the shower this morning (12/02) when we thought of what an appalling load of makeword is involved in sales taxes - just think of the little increments of wasted time all over the nation's retail businesses - must add up to billions of hours on the part of millions of people. And the 'captains of industry' have the unmitigated gall to talk about 'efficiency'? Ha! And lest high tech get on its high horse, consider the makework involved in the computer virus industry. Just last night the "faithful guardian of Kate's computer popped up a little alarmist screen that said "Danger! Risk of infection! Your virus checker is over a month old! Time to update!" This is basically institutionalized industrial sabotage. And probably the virus checkers are in many cases the virus writers. "Hey, Joe, we ain't had a big virus scare lately. Better get on it! What'll we call it this time?"

What we have today is nothing more than Makework Capitalism, and with timesizing we can get some real efficiency with Sharework Capitalism. And get some real human progress rolling again. We here at Timesizing.com just don't find that DVD TV and all the other cosmetic "break throughs" of technology in recent years make it for us. We still have all the big old problems, eg: under-employment (cuz our definition of "full time work" is 60-yrs obsolete), poverty (cuz we are stupid enuf to keep saying "oh I don't begrudge Bill Gates his money" - how many $ten-billions will it take before we smarten up?), health insurance, prisons.... Speaking of which, why does it matter? Why can't we just keep adding major problem-tracking indefinitely? The answer is, we only have a limited space for problems on the box menu titled "the problem vs. the timesizing solution" in the middle of our homepage. And some of these nambypamby fines and settlements are about as efficient for keeping us awake to the deterioration of our economy - and waking up others - as sales taxes are to actually getting decent revenues per manhour invested.]

11/28/2000  2 corporate settlements mentioned, totaling $19.5018m -

  1. Hancock loses suit filed 17 years ago, by Scott Nelson, Boston Globe, D10.
    ...A federal court decision award[ed] more than $19.5m to Unisys Trust in a...lawsuit...filed in 1983.
    [Filed by Unisys??]
    ..\..[The] dispute involving a group annuity contract written in 1941...arose over whether Hancock, as the life insurer underwriting the group annuity, had a fiduciary responsibility for Unisys Corp.'s retirement plan..\..
    [Article gives insufficient info for 'armchair quarterbacking.' If Unisys Trust filed the suit, was it squawking because Hancock hadn't looked over its shoulder? - which would be stupid - or because Hancock screwed up on investment decisions that were in Hancock's court? - which would make sense. Maybe the court couldn't figure it out either and that's why it took 17 years.]
    John Hancock Financial Services said it will appeal....

  2. 9 toy stores fined $1,800 for pricing errors as high as $20, by Bruce Mohl, Boston Globe, D6.
    ...but overall the three chains surveyed did a good job of charging customers correct prices. Of 2,500 items checked at 26 toy stores, inspectors from the state Division of Standards found that 51 scanned incorrectly. Those 51 errors resulted in a total of $181 in undercharges and $45 in overcharges. Only the overcharges resulted in fines.... Overall, the 8 Toys "R" Us stores had the lowest accuracy percentage at 97.01%. The 15 K-B Toy Stores were at 98.14%, and the 3 Disney Stores were at 99.67%....

11/23/2000  1 compound corporate settlement mentioned, totaling over $14m - 11/18/2000  2 corporate settlements mentioned, totaling $105.5m -
  1. Italy's top insurer to pay $100m on holocaust-era policies, by Alessandra Stanley, NYT, A4.
    ROME...- Italy's largest insurance company, Assicurazioni Generali, has agreed to pay up to $100m to Holocaust-era policy-holders [via] the International Commission of Holocaust-Era Insurance Claims, which works on behalf of victims of the Nazi era [and] is made up of international Jewish and Holocaust survivor groups, American and European regulators, insurers and the State of Israel. The Commission will pay out claims to survivors and heirs..\..
    The accord, signed here on Wed. night [Nov. 15] is the first major settlement between European insurers and the...Commission.... Generali...is based in Trieste and owns, among other companies, Migdal, Israel's largest insurer....

  2. Time Warner settles suit with Labor Department, Reuters via NYT, B3.
    ...agreed to pay $5.5m to settle a lawsuit brought by the Labor Dept. in 1998 accusing the company of illegally denying full-time workers pensions and health benefits by classifying them as temporary workers or contractors....

11/17/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned - 11/16/2000  2 corporate fines/settlements mentioned -
  1. Qwest is ordered to pay $350m to AT&T, AP via NYT, C4.
    Qwest Communications International Inc. was ordered by a jury in Austin, Tex., to pay AT&T more than $350m in punitive damages...equivalent to about 75% of Qwest's 1999 profits..\..for repeatedly cutting a fiber optic phone line.... The jury awarded AT&T $1.2m in actual damages....
    [So, 350+1.2= a total of $351.2m damages.]

  2. Virginia power concern settles suit, pointer digest (to A1), NYT, C1.
    The Virginia Electric Power Co., accused of violating clean air standards and contributing to acid rain and smog in the Northeast, has agreed to the settlement of a landmark lawsuit that would require it to cut emissions from 8 coal-burning plants by 70%. Officials hope the agreement will set a precedent to be followed by other power companies across the Midwest and the South.

11/15/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned - 11/11/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned, $$ yet unknown - 11/10/2000  2 more corporate settlements mentioned, totaling $200m + $undisclosed -
  1. Rite Aid to pay $200m to settle shareholder lawsuits, by Floyd Norris, NYT, C4.
    ...class-action lawsuits...by agreeing to pay $200m in cash and securities and by agreeing to help shareholders in their lawsuits against the company's former top management and auditors. The agreement left Martin Grass, Rite Aid's former chairman; Timothy Noonan, its former president; and Frank Bergonzi, its former chief financial officer, to fend for themselves....

  2. AT&T settles patent dispute, Bloomberg via NYT, C6.
    ...with Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing LP [over] interactive voice technology...used in AT&T's calling card, collect calling, messaging and other services..\.. AT&T...agreed to pay and undisclosed sum....

11/07/2000  2 corporate settlements mentioned, totaling $3.7m + unspecified -
  1. Civil judgment against Microsoft, by John Markoff, NYT, C6.
    A federal judge in Connecticutt issued a final judgment yesterday in a private antitrust suit...brought by Bristol Technologies, ruling that Microsoft must pay $3.7m of Bristol's legal expenses. The case centered on a "software bridge" that Bristol had developed to ease the creation of programs that could run on both the Unix operating system and Microsoft's industrial-strength counterpart, Windows NT. Bristol accused Microsoft of unfair business dealings....

  2. L'Oreal S.A., NYT, C4.
    ...Paris, the largest cosmetics company in the world, agreed to settle patent infringement claims brought by TriStrata Technology Inc., Princeton, NJ...over a wrinkle-cream formula.

11/04/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned - 11/03/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned - 11/02/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned - 10/26/2000  2 corporate settlements mentioned, totaling $8m + unspecified -
  1. CBS agrees to settle discrimination suit, by Jim Rutenberg, NYT, C14.
    CBS has agreed to pay $8m to about 200 of its female technicians who said in a class-action lawsuit [filed in 1996] that they had been sexually harassed and discriminated against at six CBS stations.... They also said they were subjected to a work environment generally hostile to women. The women were employed as camera operators, film editors, equipment maintainers and in other technical positions....
    [CBS: Cutting-edge-equipment, Backward Sensibilities.]

  2. Microsoft settles WebTV complaint, Bloomberg via NYT, C4.
    ...[from the FTC alleging that it misled consumers by saying its TV-based Internet browser gave viewers the same ability to surf the...Web as computer users..\.. Microsoft's WebTV [Networks] unit...agreed to distribute consumer-education brochures and advertising to correct [this mistaken impression]. The Microsoft unit also agreed to reimburse some consumers for long-distance charges they did not expect to incur....
10/25/2000  1 corporate settlement report, totaling $97m - 10/24/2000  2 corporate fines/settlements mentioned, totaling $425k -
  1. Hasbro unit fined for not reporting, Bloomberg via Boston Globe, C9.
    ...Galoob Toys Inc. has agreed to pay $400,000 to settle allegations it failed to report defects and injuries associated with its Sky Dancer doll, the Consumer Safety Commission said. Galoob, which was purchased by Hasbro in Nov. 1998, failed to report 150 injuries involving the Sky Dancer, a hard plastic doll...sold nationwide from 1994 to June 2000..\..that can fly rapidly in unpredictable directions after being launched into the air.... The injuries included eye damage..., a mild concussion, a broken rib, broken teeth, and facial lacerations.... Almost 9m dolls were recalled by Galoob in June 2000....
    [Sounds like a bad concept for a toy. Boy, where do they get these 'toy' designers?]

  2. Day-trading firm hit with fine, 2-year ban in Mass., by Beth Healy, Boston Globe, C5.
    State securities regulators have slapped a $25,000 fine on All-Tech Direct Inc. and ordered the New Jersey day trading firm to stop doing business in Massachusetts for two years, saying the company violated terms of an earlier disciplinary action. All-Tech failed to make certain customers stop trading on behalf of other people, including their family members, the Mass. Securities Division said yesterday. Under the order...All-Tech must return Mass. customers' securities or assets, or transfer them to another brokerage account.... The state said a "willful" violation of the latest sanctions could result in a 3-yr prison term....
10/20/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned - 10/18/2000  2 corporate fines/settlements mentioned, totaling $35m -
  1. MP3.com, music group reach deal, AP via Boston Globe, C6.
    SAN DIEGO - The National Music Publisher' Assoc. and MP3.com Inc. have reached a preliminary settlement that will make more than 1m musical compositions available on the popular My.MP3.com. The 3-yr agreement calls for MP3.com to pay up to $30m to the association's licensing unit, Harry Fox Agency Inc....
    The publishing association had sued MP3.com in March over the use of its members' songs through My.MP3.com, an Internet service allowing users to listen to music from Cds they already own or which they purchase from MP3.com's retail partners. If the settlement is approved by individual Harry Fox Agency music publisher-principals, NMPA will drop the suit....
    [There's GOTTA be better ways for people to 'listen to music they already own' than tying up the Internet! This is comparable to the backwards efficiency of transferring cross-country freight from railroad trains hundreds of cars long all pulled by 2-5 diesel locomotives and drivers, to hundreds of individual diesel transport trailer trucks, hugely out-of-scale on the nation's highways, each FCE (freight care equivalent) pulled by its own fossil-fuel-burning diesel-engined cab and driver. This is but one of thousands of examples of the extreme, inefficient, and artificial makework that both public and private sectors of our economy have got into since we froze the workweek at a pre-technological level in 1940, and made a whole nation desperate to find human work to do in the face of mounting technological efficiencies and output multipliers. We should, of course, be simply sharing the vanishing work, instead of trying to deny that technology is actually efficient with brain-dead phrases like, "But technology creates more jobs than it destroys." Suuure it does. You freeze your workweek after 160 years of shortening it, and technology will force you to create more featherbedding and makework, more superfluous production and consumption, than the environment will be able to long sustain. The only question is, which will go critical first, the environment, or the extreme concentration of wealth occasioned by the desperate job insecurity of the majority of ordinary employees and their consequent failure to get pay raises at anything like the rate of profit-making allowed by the constant inflow of new technology. If neither goes critical, humanity will subspeciate as the rich continue to get richer and split off into isolated islands of different wealth levels, and the poor stay poor. Sort of like the workers and drones, or the Eloi and the Morlocks, in the simplest, two-tiered case. We're assuming it won't be allowed to go that far because of recent population-integrating choices like the American Civil War's abolition of slavery and South Africa's abolition of apartheid. But the only fully developed program to prevent it from happening in the future is Timesizing.]

  2. Lockheed Martin Corp., NYT, C4.
    ...Los Angeles, had its $5m offer to settle claims accepted by about 350 residents of Burbank, Calif., who say chemicals from the company's plants made them sick.

10/17/2000  7-in-1 corporate settlement mentioned, totaling $213,000 - 10/12/2000  1 part of complex dispute settled, totaling $?? - 10/11/2000  1 complex of corporate fines/settlements mentioned, totaling $1.497B - 10/10/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned, totaling $13.3m - 10/07/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned, totaling $10k + $undisclosed + promises - 10/04/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned, totaling $30m - 10/03/2000  2 corporate fines/settlements mentioned, totaling $95.537m -
  1. Big hospital manager settles two fraud suits, by Kurt Eichenwald, NYT, A22.
    The Quorum Health Group, the nation's largest hospital management company, has agreed in principle to pay $95.5m, in civil penalties to settle two lawsuits that accused it of defrauding federal health care programs like Medicare. Both suits involved an arcane accounting practice known as cost reporting, which has been at the center of widespread criminal and civil investigations in the hospital industry....

  2. Mitsubishi Motors is fined, by Miki Tanikawa, NYT, W1.
    A Tokyo court has ordered [them] to pay a fine of...about $37,000, the maximum penalty, for failing to report repairs of defective automobiles to the Transport Ministry and failing to disclose the cases to the public. The company eventually recalled 620,000 cars and trucks.

9/28/2000  4 corporate settlements mentioned, totaling $?? - 9/27/2000  2 corporate settlements/fines mentioned, totaling $83.5m -
  1. Aetna agrees to settlement, AP via NYT, C31.
    ...The nation's largest insurer..\..has agree to pay $82.5m to settle a class-action shareholder lawsuit accusing the insurer of misleading investors [in] failing to disclose problems that the company, based in Hartford, was having in mid-1997 relating to its purchase of U.S. Healthcare....
    [Here's another area of takeover-related problems besides downsizing.]

  2. Testing lab admits obstructing probe, AP via Boston Globe, E2.
    ...Caleb Brett USA Inc. agreed to pay a $1m fine \for\ trying to derail a federal investigation into how doctored data allowed up to 300m gallons of substandard gasoline to be sold in the New York metropolitan area....

9/26/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned, totaling $7.8m - 9/25/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned, totaling $512m -

9/23/2000  1 corporate fine mentioned, totaling $45.5m -

9/19/2000  2 corporate fines/settlements mentioned, totaling $70.2m -
  1. Bayer to pay $14m in pricing case, AP via NYT, C6.
    A U.S. unit of the German pharmaceutical giant Bayer A.G. has tentatively agreed to pay federal and state governments...to resolve accusations that it lied about the wholesale prices of certain drugs, including those to treat AIDS....

  2. Paper makers settle price-fixing lawsuit, Bloomberg via NYT, C28.
    ...Kimberly-Clark, which is based in Dallas and is the world's top tissue maker \e.g.\ Kleenex facial tissue and Scott paper towels - and other commercial tissue manufacturers [e.g.] Fort James Corp., North America's No.1 tissue maker, and Georgia Pacific, the No.2 U.S. forest products company..\..have agreed to settle a price-fixing lawsuit for $56.2m.... The suit asserted that [they] had conspired to raise the price for tissues, toilet paper, paper towels, paper napkins and other items.... Plaintiffs in the class-action settlement..."substantial commercial entities"..\..will receive $18m in cash and $38.2m in coupons redeemable for 15% of the cost of commercial tissue products....
9/15/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned, totaling $400,000 - 9/9/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned, totaling $?? - 9/08/2000  3 or 4-in-1 corporate settlements mentioned, totaling $46.4424m - 9/07/2000  1 corporate settlement mentioned, totaling $46.4424m - 9/02/2000  4 corporate fines/settlements mentioned, totaling $46.4424m -
  1. Provident [Mutual Life Insurance] to pay $45m in policyholders' suit, Reuters via NYT, B3.
    ...to 200,000 of its policyholders who say they were misled over the performance of their life insurance policies. [They] bought nonvariable cash-value life insurance policies between 1984 and 1996 [in which they say,] among other things, that the insurer misrepresented the cost of the policies..\.. The settlement is the latest in a series of payouts by life insurers, totaling several billion dollars, concerning accusations that insurers misled customers, or sold them inappropriate products, in the 1980's and 1990's....
    [Note the gradual demise of the principle of "caveat emptor" = "let the buyer beware" - in other words, it's the buyers' problem if they're stupid enough or sucker enough to get rooked. Guess the idea is that sellers are getting so smart and so technical and complicated, that buyers can't reasonably be expected to figure it out any more. Notice that this diminishes greatly the ability of buyers to validly choose between different products in the marketplace in many areas. Buying melons at the supermarket that you can still feel and smell is one thing, but then there's the complexity of modern automobile tires where you need Consumers' Reports (mentioned as early as 1927 in Arthur Dahlberg's "Utopia through Capitalism") and government action when incidents of failure mount up to force a product recall (as with Bridgestone), and then there's predatory lending where mortgage companies shake down vulnerable buyers where you need massive government intervention. As these market failures mount up, there goes the adequacy of the totally unregulated "free market" and of Ayn Rand's (and the Libertarians') brave new world. On the other hand, you can certainly get hyperprotectionism - the stifling effect of too much, too soon regulation. So, an economic design must take care to inject the minimum necessary regulation at each step. Timesizing does so by means of an initial phase that lets the participating population define the problem(s) and pace and size the solution(s).]

  2. Microsoft told to pay million to small rival [Bristol Technologies] - Judge in Connecticut talks of 'classic bait-and-switch' tactics, by John Markoff, NYT, B1.
    ...Bristol [which developed] a "software bridge" intended to ease the creation of programs that could run on both the Unix operating system and...Windows NT, ...accused Microsoft of an unfair effort to change the terms of their business relationship after Windows NT gained a foothold in the market and Microsoft lost its incentive to foster the use of Unix....

  3. $250,000 fine [vs. Merrill Lynch] for being short on capital for 3 days, Reuters via NYT, B3.
    ...in 1998, a violation of the [New York Stock] Exchange's rules to protect investor funds. A "computational error" caused Merrill's broker-dealer subsidiary to fall short of the exchange's capital requirements by $962m-3B in the midst of the Asia financial crisis in October 1998, the Big Board [=NYSE] said. The Merrill unit was required to have at least $3B in cash on hand to handle noncustomer-account activities like making markets in stocks, purchasing Treasury securities and financing ongoing operations.

  4. Employer's English-only policy brings a settlement of $192,500, NYT, A9.
    A St. Louis manufacturer [Watlow Electric Mfg] agreed...to settle a civil rights suit brought by the Equal Opportunity Coommission on behalf of eight Hispanic workers who were required to speak only English while on the assembly line.
    [Could it not be dangerous if they didn't? Could they not then be sued by OSHA for unsafe practices? This is starting to shape up as a Catch 22 = damned if you do, damned if you don't, no-win situation for companies = government over-regulation and micromanagement that puts businesses in an impossible position.]
    The settlement was the largest involving an English-only policy since the agency began tracking the practice among employers four years ago.... There is no federal law specifically prohibiting businesses from adopting English-only rules. Rather, the EEOC has sued to overturn some by invoking Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a provision that bars employment discrimination based on national origin. While the agency deems some such policies to have a sufficient basis - to help maintain job safety by ensuring clear communication, for instance - the suit against Watlow said that its employees had been unfairly disciplined for speaking Spanish to one another. One woman, it said, was fired simply for greeting another employee in Spanish....
    [Yes, but what was the background? This could have been a situation where the non-Spanish-speaking employees were being frozen out of a sub-group in a taunting way. We would argue that this is an improper extension of Title VII and an example of suffocating government micromanagement. The EEOC needs to get its big nose out of this area.]
    Watlow conceded no wrongdoing, saying it was settling to avoid costly litigation. Ed Jepson, a lawyer for the company, said that a third of the Batavia [Ill.] plant's workers were Hispanic and that the English-only rule had been adopted to improve communication on the assembly line. It never applied to any worker who was away from the line, Mr. Jepson said. "The company was having trouble with productivity and quality control because people weren't talking to each other," he said. "This is a company that values diversity and encourages diversity"..\..
    [So a company that is trying to do the right thing, and trying hard, is getting burned.]
    "Companies are finally learning a lesson about what they can and can't do with respect to requiring workers to speak English," said Jose J. Behar, the agency's main lawyer on the case....
    [We suspect that what Watlow has learned is, not to bend over so far to hire minorities, and if these kinds of costs repeat, to close its U.S. operations and move all the associated jobs out of the country - possibly to a Hispanic economy such as Mexico where everyone can be expected to speak the same language without government involvement of any kind.]
    The suit...stemmed from a 1997 staff meeting where management distributed a two-page "performance initiative," said Mr. Behar, of the EEOC. Among ways to improve productivity, the document listed a ban on employees' speaking anything but English while working. The move provoked instant opposition from a handful of employees, three of whom were suspended and eventually fired for refusing to comply, Mr. Behar said.
    [Behar is condemning himself out of his own mouth.]
    Ultimately, he said, all but one of the eight workers involved in the suit left the company.
    [Another issue here is the nature of work. Work is where you give up control of your time in exchange for money. That's why we need to limit worktime and respect those limits - to get balance - to guarantee a large and expanding time in our lives when WE have control and not somebody else. Work is where we are tied in to other people and aren't just living for ourselves. Note the article implies that a majority of the Hispanic workers at Watlow understood this and had no problem with it. The long-term result of this over-zealous and over-extended application of a law barring employment discrimination based on national origin is a louder "giant sucking sound" as American jobs fly out of the country because of politically correct catering to the oversensitive and unrealistic expectations of a minority of newcomers - a case of the "squeaking wheel" getting far too much "grease" to operate smoothly.]

Click here for corporate fines/settlements in -
May-Aug/2000


For more details, see our "social software" manual Timesizing, Not Downsizing, which is available online from *Amazon.com and at bookstores in Harvard and Porter Squares, Cambridge, Mass.

Comments, questions, suggestions?  E-mail us or phone 617-623-8080 (Boston).


Top | Homepage