The Timesizing® Wire - HOMEPAGE
©2000 Phil Hyde, The Timesizing Wire™, Box 622, Cambridge MA 02140 USA 617-623-8080
The Black Thirty Hour Work Week Bill
72d Congress, 2d Session: S.5267, passed 53-30 by US Senate Apr.6, 1933
Click here for other legislation.

          “In [the fall of 1932, the American Federation of Labor (AFL)] drafted a bill that limited hours per week to 30. The AFL had considered a constitutional amendment for the regulation of hours in their November convention, but settled on legislation suggested to the organization by such groups as the National Citizens' League for Industrial Recovery and the National Grange. In December [1932, conservative Senator] Hugo Black [D, Ala.] introduced the AFL bill to the 72nd Congress, to prohibit, in interstate or foreign commerce, all goods produced by establishments where workers were employed more than five days a week or 6 hours a day.
          “Several affiliated unions had argued that provisions for a minimum wage should be included in the bill. The AFL, however, concluded that such a piece of legislation would have less political support and would almost certainly be ruled unconstitutional. Moreover, most labor leaders opposed minimum-wage provisions, reasoning that a minimum wage could easily become a maximum wage. [Editorial comment: this is exactly what has happened for unskilled workers.]
          “The best course of action would be to enforce a nationwide reduction in the supply of labor. This would bring immediate 'work relief.' Then, as more people were put back to work at 30 hours, [they would be earning money,] purchasing power would expand..\..buyer confidence would return...and the economy would recover. Once the economy improved, labor could bargain effectively for higher wages [from a strong position of] labor scarcity....”   (From Ben Hunnicutt's *Work Without End, Temple Univ. Press, 1988, page 150).
          The bill passed the U.S. Senate on April 6, 1933 by a vote of 53-30.

          What happened to the Black Bill?  FDR took one look at it and essentially said (A) It's not mine!   (B) It's SOCIALISM! - and proceeded to tie it up in committee of the House, whence it emerged five years later as the Fair Labor Standards Act with all its 30-hour teeth pulled (see our 40/40/40 page and/or overview). Meanwhile, Saint FDR initiated more socialist government regulations and programs than you could shake a stick at, from social security to workmen's compensation to minimum wage to unemployment insurance to a whole alphabet soup of makework campaigns (WPA, CCC, NRA, NIRA, TVA...),

In other words, the War ended the Depression - the New Deal was just a sugar pill.  The year 1933 presented a Great Fork in the Road and we blew it.  Thanks to FDR, we made the wrong choice - FDR admitted as much in 1935 (see Jeremy Rifkin's End of Work, p.29).  This was the biggest mistake of the century, because it meant that human beings still actually needed war to solve their biggest problem, the overwhelming centripetal, center-seeking, concentrating force on ... money.
          At least we got one thing right after the War.  We didn't shove our enemies' faces into the mud with vengeful economy-breaking indemnities (nation-level fines) as we did after World War I to Kaiser's starving Germany, thus guaranteeing another round.  After WW2, we helped the Germans, and the Japanese, and for a time, our aid programs, coupled with the GI Bill and the Federal Highways Program even created enough artificial jobs to keep our economy afloat, especially after the War's massive killing and maiming of the huge American labor surplus of the late '20s and the Depression.
          Yet the massive government micromanagement of the New Deal has been with us ever since, straining ineffectually to mount enough makework to achieve full employment, and the workweek maximum has stuck at its 1940 level of 40 hours a week (and even that isn't enforced).   And once the babyboomers hit the job market around 1970, forcing housewives in as well to prop household income, real wages went and stayed flat. The record-breaking automation of the '80s and immigration of the '90s made things worse. If we'd introduce this single, effective, balancing regulation at the center of our economy, we could dismantle the by-now thousands of ineffectual regulations, policies and programs positioned everywhere but the center. The "everywhere but" approach has had a 69 years' trial. Today, with the longest workweeks in the world (see 7/08/2001, item 3), the shortest vacations, flat wages, and record homelessness and incarceration, it's time to try the approach we condemned without trial 69 years ago. Timesizing.

For further information on worktime economics, see our "social software" manual alias campaign piece, Timesizing, Not Downsizing, which is available online from *Amazon.com and on the 3rd floor of The Harvard Coop in Harvard Square, Cambridge, Mass., USA in the economics and mgmt sections.

Comments, questions, suggestions?  E-mail us or phone 617-623-8080 (Boston).


Top | Homepage